BRAVO AND BRAVA!!! The Beltway crowd has discovered populism. Senator Elizabeth Warren’s surging popularity [stemming] from her aggressive defense of Social Security and demand for Wall Street accountability has triggered talk of a populist challenge to Hillary Clinton in 2016.
Bill De Blasio indicted New York’s gilded age inequality in his stunning victory in the New York Mayoral race.
This month, President Obama returned to his campaign themes, delivering a speech calling inequality “the defining challenge of our time.”
Republicans, preoccupied with their Tea Party zealots, mostly have avoided joining the debate, but the Wall Street wing of the Democratic Party [the New Democrats at the Third Way ] raised the alarm.
Populism, by definition, doesn’t trickle down from the top. It spreads as a bottom up movement that chooses and elevates its own leaders. It doesn’t spread because Elizabeth Warren is espousing politically toxic and unpopular ideas. Rather Warren is threatening because she champions attitudes and ideas that enjoy widespread popularity outside the beltway, but are slighted inside of it.
Populist movements grow out of popular discontent.
Times have been “hard” for most people for a long time. When families lose ground, people tend to believe that they are at fault, that their luck has been bad, that they made the wrong choices. They work harder; they take on debt; they get by. Resignation and deference are normal. Movements start only when reality—and organizers—begin to open people’s eyes.
The above statements are lifted from the article “Populism Rising?” by Robert Borosage on the Campaign for America’s Future website (December 23, 2013). Needles to say, I encourage my readers (both of you!) to click on over to the CFAF site and read this immediately . . .
[br] [br] [br]