FROM TODAY’S SEATTLE TIMES (July 19, 2013) and a piece titled “Gun-rights group sues city over emails allegedly withheld” (page B1): an organization called Washington CeaseFire is described as “an anti-gun violence group.” Technically, this is correct: the hyphen is necessary to link “anti” with “gun.” But the word “violence “ is left hanging: one could read this as saying that the group was against guns but prone to violence in its efforts to achieve its goals.
While another hyphen is NOT properly required, I believe that extra punctuation that assists the reader in understanding exactly what the writer intends should be encouraged. In this case, had there been two hyphens (as in “anti-gun-violence”), there would be NO doubt as to the fact that Washington CeaseFire was a group attempting to stop the spread of violence caused by gun-users.
Needless to say—a phrase virtually every grammar guide warns against using—I am probably NOT going to have my way on this issue in the foreseeable future. (Unless, of course, this site becomes as popular as Julie Powell’s blog was in 2002-2003.) I can always run around singing “I want hyphen” to the tune of I Want Candy . . .
HEADER IMAGE: A romanticist’s fantasy: as much as it seems logical to assume that arming women prevents rape, it just ain’t so. If it were, we would be reading regular news articles about women standing off rapists if not outright shooting them. We don’t. What we do read is statistics telling us that bringing a gun into our homes dramatically increases the likelihood of our dying by a gun. Your call, really . . .
[br] [br] [br]