reefer sanity in Idaho: “I smoked weed and nobody died ”

WE’RE NOT TV-WATCHERS in my house, so un­less some­thing out­ra­geously hap­pens, we are not up on what’s hap­pening with con­tem­po­rary com­mer­cials. That means that I oc­ca­sion­ally see a spot from the Super Bowl be­cause of the ex­tra­or­di­nary at­ten­tion those com­mer­cials get in the making and in the viewing. But your normal everyday ad spot never crosses my screen.

So it is that I haven’t kept up with the non­sense that passes for “fact” on the var­ious anti-drug com­mer­cials that have run on tele­vi­sion. Ap­par­ently, I may be missing out on some good en­ter­tain­ment if David Siro­ta’s ar­ticle ti­tled “Reefer Sanity Takes Hold in Col­orado” for Buz­zflash (Jan­uary 13, 2014) is an indication:

“Seven years be­fore legal mar­i­juana went on sale this month in my home state of Col­orado, the drug war­riors in Pres­i­dent George W. Bush’s ad­min­is­tra­tion re­leased an ad­ver­tise­ment that is now worth revisiting.

‘I smoked weed and no­body died,’ in­toned the teenage nar­rator. ‘I didn’t get into a car ac­ci­dent. I didn’t OD on heroin the next day. Nothing happened.’

The tele­vi­sion spot from the White House drug czar was in­tended to dis­courage mar­i­juana use by de­picting it as boring. But in the process, the gov­ern­ment sug­gested that smoking a little pot is lit­er­ally, in the words of the nar­rator, ‘the safest thing in the world.’

Why is this spot worth re­vis­iting? Be­cause in light of what’s hap­pening here in Col­orado, the ad looks less like a scary warning than a re­as­sur­ingly ac­cu­rate prophecy.”


This is your brain on marijuana

I do re­call reading about a spot that ran during Rea­gan’s Reign of Error: the screen showed an EEG with a normal brain-wave ac­com­pa­nied by a voice-over that told you that this was your brain being “normal.” It was fol­lowed by the same EEG showing a flat line, but this time you were told that this was your brain on marijuana.

A flat-line on an EEG or an means that the pa­tient’s brain shows zero activity—that is, the brain is dead.

And there­fore, the pa­tient is dead.

So, the War on Drugs spot lied.

In fact, after a couple of hits of pot, most peo­ple’s brain waves re­semble a sine-wave. This wave nor­mally in­di­cates a brain that is both re­laxed and focused—it is a brain at its optimum.

Sine-wave on an EEG are often found in brains that are med­i­tating. In other words, it is the op­po­site of a flat-line and makes the gov­ern­ment’s lie even more egre­gious. I could could go on but in­stead we’re back to David Sirota:

“Of course, this por­trait of tran­quility, nor­malcy and prag­ma­tism is often down­played by the sen­sa­tion­alist na­tional media in far­away Wash­ington, DC. There, amid wild spec­u­la­tion about ab­surdly apoc­a­lyptic hy­po­thet­i­cals, the fist-shaking fo­gies are neg­a­tively car­i­ca­turing le­gal­iza­tion in a fit of reefer madness.

For in­stance, there’s been tripe like Ruth Mar­cus’s Wash­ington Post screed that at once warns of the sup­posed ‘perils of le­gal­ized pot’ and ab­solves her­self for pre­vi­ously using the drug.

There was also the lament from the New York Times’ David Brooks, in which he first fondly rem­i­nisced about his erst­while pot smoking and then claimed that le­gal­izing mar­i­juana harms Amer­i­ca’s ‘moral ecology.’ You also have to wonder how many of them chatted up the ‘perils of pot’ this month while en­joying a post-workday cocktail.”


In states where mar­i­juana is legal, one can no longer as­sume that a couple of co-workers openly ex­horting others to join them for a few buds after work are inviting them for a few cold ones at the pub on the corner.

The burden of bullshit enforcement

The ar­ticle is fol­lowed by sev­eral com­ments from readers. Prob­ably the vast per­centage of read­er’s com­ments are worth­less, but I have se­lected the first such com­ment (from Ti­betan Cowboy) for a point it brings up:

“Var­ious num­bers have been pub­lished re­garding taxes and re­tail sales. Cred­ible num­bers are $70,000,000 in pot taxes and $600,000,000 in pot sales this year alone. Those num­bers will be [three to four times] higher next year most likely.

Reason enough to le­galize a rel­a­tively harm­less nat­ural product, not to men­tion the over­whelming cost sav­ings from in­car­cer­a­tions, law en­force­ment of bull­shit laws, vi­o­lence of il­legal dis­tri­b­u­tion and sales of pot, etc.

Some states are now granting amnesty and pro­ba­tion to their pris­oners who are in prison only for pot in­frac­tions. I be­lieve NY state is one of them.

And this is re­moving the burden of bull­shit en­force­ment of laws against a trivial sub­stance al­lowing peace of­fi­cers to spend time on real crim­i­nals and crimes. The overall ben­e­fits of legal pot are as­tounding and dif­fi­cult to mea­sure they are so far reaching, on many levels both deep and wide.”

Ac­tu­ally, the price of legal weed in idaho should be dra­mat­i­cally lower than the former il­legal weed. This should lower the amount of spend­able cash in those com­mu­ni­ties or fam­i­lies that cul­ti­vated and sold it. Of course, the taxes will be an enor­mous boon to the state and, hope­fully, most of those people. Taxes should reach nine fig­ures rather quickly, not some­thing to laugh at in a sparsely pop­u­lated state.

Also, there should be a boom in tourism throughout the state. This will put even more money in cir­cu­la­tion and more taxes paid! For this reason, the state should see that even the smallest town in Idaho has its own corner pot shoppe.



 
 

Subscribe
Notify of
Rate this article:
Please rate this article with your comment.
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x